So he breached it by publishing the whole judgment on his website. How could a decision to deny defendants a jury be secret The suppression order could not be valid. In fact, it wasnt a clear breach of the law, but Mr Siemer seems unburdened by the distinction between a decision that may be open to criticism and one that is an attack on the very foundations of justice so blatant and destructive of the rule of law that it can only be the product of corruption). Her decision discussed evidence that may have later been ruled inadmissible.įor him, this decision denied most of the defendants their fundamental right to trial by jury.įor him, it was a clear breach of the law, including the Bill of Rights Act. She didnt give any reasons, but she clearly intended to protect fair trial rights. Winkelmann J ruled that three of the defendants should be tried separately, and the remaining 15 should be tried by judge alone.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |